WeChat users in the short term and is likely to affect the experience

[rifat28dddd]

The difference it shows is not enough to support the inherent understanding of the concept of “Q&A” by most people. On the other hand, Wenwen is relatively rough in terms of content richness and user experience. For example, many people still don’t know where its entrance is. The results displayed by WeChat search have already displayed the content of the question. For example, the threshold for asking a question or posting is not low, requiring users to register a public account or video account.



This is difficult for ordinary and participation of users and creators. This bolivia phone numbers also determines that it is difficult for Ask to quickly become a civilian-level Q&A product. Another detail that cannot be ignored is that there is room for significant improvement in the quality of Q&A content. Judging from the content of some of the current answers, it may be limited by the 5-word length limit, or it may be that Q&A does not want to become another version of “Zhihua”.



In the early Weibo or Moments, in-depth discussions and high-quality information cannot be fully displayed. This is not necessarily a good thing for Souisou. An analogy with another fossil-level Q&A product: Baidu Knows. Its content quality is also uneven, and it eventually became an important reason for Baidu’s search results to be mixed. Judging from the latest actions, WeChat will further strengthen the questioning. One of them is to continuously explore many interesting ways to play with users through operational methods.