Hello Quality Rater Guidelines

[rifat28dddd]

Panda brought peace to the minds of users who weren't happy with the poor search results. In keeping with its mission, these low-quality pages were devalued, because only satisfied users would use Google in the future. Panda ravenously attacked poor websites with even poorer content.

Instead, sites that provided high-quality content (original and informative) were rewarded with high rankings—a premise that remains true to this day. In May 2011, Google provided tips on creating high-quality websites on the Webmaster Central blog to help webmasters. These included questions such as:

Would you trust the information contained in this article?
Was the article written by an expert or a cambodia cell phone number list knowledgeable layperson, or is it rather superficial?
Does the website have duplicate, overlapping, or redundant articles on the same or similar topics with slightly different keywords?
Would you trust this website with your credit card information?
Does this article contain spelling, stylistic, or factual errors?

Do the topics correspond to the real interests of the website's readers or does the website generate content with the aim of achieving a good ranking in search engines?
Does the article contain original content or information, original reporting, original research, or original analysis?
Does the page have significant value compared to other pages in the search results?
The guiding document for evaluating high-quality content is the Google Quality Rater Guidelines , which are kept up to date by the search engine.