The video must also be unique

[sumaiyakhatun29]

Now there will be a small spoiler about the fact that the three statements above are not entirely true. I came across this site when I started studying what non-unique content would “pass” for search engines. The uniqueness of the text on this site is close to zero – it is a typical doorway with a mishmash of other people’s text: The domain was registered in March 2016.


How do you like this traffic growth chart? From zero to half a million in a year brazil consumer email list and a half. You probably have the same, with unique content? So, what was the myth about the need for unique text material based on: It was fueled by text exchanges (which is logical, it’s their bread and butter). Search engines within a single site excluded similar pages from search results (considering them to be the same).


Webmasters hungry for freebies tried to simply copy someone else's success - stealing texts and photos en masse. The sites naturally fell under filters and were banned by search engines (as duplicates and for lack of added value). Search engines themselves have stated the importance of unique material and even created tools for indicating the original source.