what about “heavily inspired” or rewritten content?
Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 10:13 am
Sure, creating a vertical site on a topic with dozens of useful and in-depth content earns you points in the eyes of Google ... but it's probably no longer enough. So start dedicating some of your energy to consolidating your reputation outside the site. Guest posts and digital PR are definitely winning tools you should start using (but hey, link building still has some value too, don't forget it). PSSSSS! Are you a copywriter or web content author? Don't you understand why Google rewards competitors' (bad) articles and not yours? Find out what Visible Writing is and how it can help you .
1.5 Content copied and rewritten By now even the walls bahamas phone data know that Google doesn't really like content copied literally. But Well, it's very clear in the Guidelines: quality raters are told to come down hard on copied or slightly modified content. And this also applies when the original source is cited! Content created " with no or very little time, effort, or expertise " receives the lowest quality rating ever, the same as spammy or fraudulent pages.
In short, Google wants you to put sweat and blood into your content. Therefore pay attention to the rewriting operations and how you take inspiration from the sources, work to rework the information well and insert it into an original and authoritative context. I know, this may seem paradoxical if you think that, with algorithmic updates like MUM , Google increasingly aims to appropriate the contents of sites to distribute them directly in SERPs. In any case, the message is crystal clear: the quality bar is rising higher and higher, you must be able to keep up or resign yourself to succumbing.
1.5 Content copied and rewritten By now even the walls bahamas phone data know that Google doesn't really like content copied literally. But Well, it's very clear in the Guidelines: quality raters are told to come down hard on copied or slightly modified content. And this also applies when the original source is cited! Content created " with no or very little time, effort, or expertise " receives the lowest quality rating ever, the same as spammy or fraudulent pages.
In short, Google wants you to put sweat and blood into your content. Therefore pay attention to the rewriting operations and how you take inspiration from the sources, work to rework the information well and insert it into an original and authoritative context. I know, this may seem paradoxical if you think that, with algorithmic updates like MUM , Google increasingly aims to appropriate the contents of sites to distribute them directly in SERPs. In any case, the message is crystal clear: the quality bar is rising higher and higher, you must be able to keep up or resign yourself to succumbing.