Christiaan Triebert: the world population as a research team

Dive into business data optimization and best practices.
Post Reply
arzina998
Posts: 65
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2024 3:27 am

Christiaan Triebert: the world population as a research team

Post by arzina998 »

This results in beautiful, unfiltered items. For example, dozens of Facebook users talk to an eyewitness of the assassination attempt in the gay bar in Orlando. They ask him things like "How do you feel?" and "Can I see your wound?", but also show their sympathy and dismay. In the video below you can see Acosta's presentation. The Facebook Live session starts at 10:40 minutes.


CNN airs an interview with the same eyewitness later that day, but in a traditional (edited) interview setting. The difference is astonishing. Where with Acosta you were sitting next to the man on the couch, the CNN piece feels impersonal and distant.

Video player



In addition to objective reporting, Live Interactive Video also provides an unfiltered view of society. For example, America shows its most conservative side when Acosta follows transgender Caitlyn Jenner during her visit to a school in Brooklyn. The hurtful hate comments are not off the air, but are broadcast live. That makes home furniture equipment stores email list Acosta's reporting so socially relevant. She has found a medium with which she takes news out of the journalistic bubble and brings it directly to the public. Without editing, without editing. Acosta connects the public directly with the subject and thus shows the pure, sometimes raw truth from both sides.

Pure truth. That is also the business model of Christiaan Triebert . His company does open source fact checking , which means that it uses freely available, public sources from the internet to find out, for example, the real story behind the crash of MH17. And that is important, because because of all those different reports and fake news, you as an ordinary citizen often no longer know what the truth is.

In the case of MH17, Bellingcat made a number of remarkable discoveries. A good example of what they uncovered in this case is the attempt by the Russian Ministry of Defense to shift responsibility to the Ukrainian army. When it became known that MH17 was probably shot down by a Bug missile, the Russian Ministry published two satellite photos of a Ukrainian army base. In the first photo (July 14), a Bug missile launcher can be seen. In the second photo (July 17), the day of the disaster, the launcher has disappeared. Which implies that the Ukrainian army launched a Bug missile.
Post Reply