The fashion of exclusive newsletter content – two Spanish cases
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2024 3:54 am
Is it better to publish content on a blog or in an exclusive newsletter? Here are the cases of Bonilista and Futurizable.
Carlos Bravo13
No, this post is just another installment of the popular debate about whether articles should be sent in full or in part to blog subscribers . My point of view has never changed from the beginning. You have to make it as convenient as possible for the reader, so I am in favor of sending the full post without the user having to go through your blog to receive all the information. Maybe this strategy is one of the reasons why Feedly likes me .
newsletters
Advantages and disadvantages of publishing content only through a newsletter
This time the debate is a little different and has to do with a japan phone number recent “fashion” although honestly that is a bit of an exaggeration considering that I am only basing it on two Spanish cases. Let me tell you about it.
Publishing articles through a blog is not the only way to spread them. You can also do it through a newsletter . This means that if you are not subscribed to that list you will not have access to the content because it is not published anywhere else.
To give you an idea of the meaning of restricting access when what the rest of the world is looking for is exactly the opposite: to be able to reach everyone.
A year ago I didn't subscribe to anything. You may find this a bit strange (and it is) considering that this is exactly what I look for on this blog. In the last few months I have subscribed to two sites that publish content in this way.
Bonilista and Futurizable are two star examples for publishing a newsletter
David Bonilla has been running his Bonilista for a couple of years now . Every Sunday at 11am (Madrid, Spain time) you receive his new posts in your inbox. From experience I can tell you that it's a good idea to always publish at the same time and day so that your readers are clear about when the next content will be published.
Carlos Bravo13
No, this post is just another installment of the popular debate about whether articles should be sent in full or in part to blog subscribers . My point of view has never changed from the beginning. You have to make it as convenient as possible for the reader, so I am in favor of sending the full post without the user having to go through your blog to receive all the information. Maybe this strategy is one of the reasons why Feedly likes me .
newsletters
Advantages and disadvantages of publishing content only through a newsletter
This time the debate is a little different and has to do with a japan phone number recent “fashion” although honestly that is a bit of an exaggeration considering that I am only basing it on two Spanish cases. Let me tell you about it.
Publishing articles through a blog is not the only way to spread them. You can also do it through a newsletter . This means that if you are not subscribed to that list you will not have access to the content because it is not published anywhere else.
To give you an idea of the meaning of restricting access when what the rest of the world is looking for is exactly the opposite: to be able to reach everyone.
A year ago I didn't subscribe to anything. You may find this a bit strange (and it is) considering that this is exactly what I look for on this blog. In the last few months I have subscribed to two sites that publish content in this way.
Bonilista and Futurizable are two star examples for publishing a newsletter
David Bonilla has been running his Bonilista for a couple of years now . Every Sunday at 11am (Madrid, Spain time) you receive his new posts in your inbox. From experience I can tell you that it's a good idea to always publish at the same time and day so that your readers are clear about when the next content will be published.