But let’s be honest:
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:39 am
The EU-US Privacy Shield also guaranteed protection specifically for providers from the USA .
What do you mean, "was"?
Unfortunately, in the summer of 2020, the European Court of Justice declared the data protection agreement invalid. However, under certain conditions, user data of EU citizens can still be transferred abroad, the judges decided.
Unfortunately, the topic is still difficult in 2024. Under certain conditions, it is (currently) permitted to use tools and services from the USA . You can find more details in the article by eRecht24 .
Interestingly, many people still brazil telegram screening misunderstand the term "data protection". When people say that data protection rules in the USA are not as strict as in Germany or the European Union, this does not mean that the data is in danger of falling into the hands of hackers.
In fact, US companies often have even higher standards than companies elsewhere in the world (including Germany). This "only" refers to the access of the American authorities and secret services to the data sets.
What's wrong with the NSA knowing that a subscriber who has registered for a newsletter, for example on the topic of marketing, using only his first name and email address (which is often even a freemail address from an American provider such as Yahoo, Outlook, Googlemail or Hotmail)?
I find it difficult to find any scenarios here that would indicate that this person's basic personal rights are at risk. Unfortunately, data protection officers and judges in Germany and Europe see things differently and have decided that even a dynamically assigned IP address is personal data. I have no idea how this decision could have been made. If it were so easy to identify the user based on the IP address, we would have a lot less crime. But there's no point, we have to stick to this decision.
What do you mean, "was"?
Unfortunately, in the summer of 2020, the European Court of Justice declared the data protection agreement invalid. However, under certain conditions, user data of EU citizens can still be transferred abroad, the judges decided.
Unfortunately, the topic is still difficult in 2024. Under certain conditions, it is (currently) permitted to use tools and services from the USA . You can find more details in the article by eRecht24 .
Interestingly, many people still brazil telegram screening misunderstand the term "data protection". When people say that data protection rules in the USA are not as strict as in Germany or the European Union, this does not mean that the data is in danger of falling into the hands of hackers.
In fact, US companies often have even higher standards than companies elsewhere in the world (including Germany). This "only" refers to the access of the American authorities and secret services to the data sets.
What's wrong with the NSA knowing that a subscriber who has registered for a newsletter, for example on the topic of marketing, using only his first name and email address (which is often even a freemail address from an American provider such as Yahoo, Outlook, Googlemail or Hotmail)?
I find it difficult to find any scenarios here that would indicate that this person's basic personal rights are at risk. Unfortunately, data protection officers and judges in Germany and Europe see things differently and have decided that even a dynamically assigned IP address is personal data. I have no idea how this decision could have been made. If it were so easy to identify the user based on the IP address, we would have a lot less crime. But there's no point, we have to stick to this decision.