This is not a problem exclusive to the dissolution

[mahbubamim077]

It has specific purposes and meets specific situations, and it is a serious mistake to understand it as an instrument to avoid paying taxes. Tax planning involving the formation of holding companies is possible, but it is built on more complex bases, namely when different companies are separated to give them their own treatment. And this is rare, assuming a wider range of assets that, when confused with each other, could generate tax confusion. Detail: this corporate organization for tax planning purposes can be implemented without going through the formation of a holding company. The tax technology involved in such planning is sophisticated; it is a far cry from the simplistic solutions that are being sold out there.

Most interested parties, when correctly introduced to this legal sms gateway bulgaria mechanism – its advantages and disadvantages – end up disillusioned. They find themselves victims of fashionable illusions. There is an elementary rule that should not be forgotten: do something to get something . And one of the mandatory elements of this formula is viability .

The shamelessness of the illusions of legal protection, for example, has already led many to prison. This is what we demonstrated in Asset Protection and Legal Planning (Editora Atlas): a book that denounces the disasters caused by mistaken choices: ingenuities that, for the sake of precision, characterized the practice of an illicit act (civil, tax, labor) and even a crime. As if that were not enough, the formula also raises another question: is it worth doing this to get that ? The answer is not always positive. Incorporating the assets of one (or more) person(s) into a simple or business corporation, in most cases, is nothing. That's right. Usually, it has no function whatsoever; constitutes a waste of time and unnecessary expenditure of money.