In the scientific community,
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2024 5:18 am
The selected reviewer then checks the content of the article. If the material does not meet quality standards, the article is retracted and the certificate is reset.
APNI invites reviewers of scientific articles to cooperate on philippine whatsapp number a paid basis. We will consider candidates and doctors of science. If you are interested in this work, register a reviewer account .
the highest standard now is considered to be double-blind peer review. And if you want to publish in APNI, you will have to undergo deferred peer review.The ChatGPT neural network has been on everyone's lips lately. It is used to write texts, find answers to questions, and even create theses - this is a real case. Let's talk about what ChatGPT can do and how to write articles for scientific journals using this neural network.
Is it even possible to write an article using a neural network?
Not long ago, the popular publication The Conversation published a report on a study of the ability of a neural network to write scientific texts. Authors Brian Lucey and Michael Dowling asked the chatbot ChatGPT to write down four main points that every scientific paper has. Namely, the idea of the study, a literature review, available data on the issue, and suggestions for testing the hypothesis.
The scientists received responses from the neural network in several ways. At first, they simply requested an article on a broad topic that would be suitable for publication in a scientific journal. Then the scientists uploaded about two hundred theses on the desired topic to the ChatGPT chat and asked to take them into account, and finally, they themselves began to actively participate in writing the text. To do this, they read the neural network's responses and suggested making corrections.
After using ChatGPT to generate the text, the authors formatted it into a scientific article and submitted it for review. Thirty-two experts studied the text from the bot and expressed their opinions.
Key findings of the study:
using ChatGPT to prepare texts for scientific journals is quite realistic, the texts are of a sufficient level;
the bot performs purely theoretical tasks well, when you need to take a large amount of data, compile it and draw conclusions from it;
APNI invites reviewers of scientific articles to cooperate on philippine whatsapp number a paid basis. We will consider candidates and doctors of science. If you are interested in this work, register a reviewer account .
the highest standard now is considered to be double-blind peer review. And if you want to publish in APNI, you will have to undergo deferred peer review.The ChatGPT neural network has been on everyone's lips lately. It is used to write texts, find answers to questions, and even create theses - this is a real case. Let's talk about what ChatGPT can do and how to write articles for scientific journals using this neural network.
Is it even possible to write an article using a neural network?
Not long ago, the popular publication The Conversation published a report on a study of the ability of a neural network to write scientific texts. Authors Brian Lucey and Michael Dowling asked the chatbot ChatGPT to write down four main points that every scientific paper has. Namely, the idea of the study, a literature review, available data on the issue, and suggestions for testing the hypothesis.
The scientists received responses from the neural network in several ways. At first, they simply requested an article on a broad topic that would be suitable for publication in a scientific journal. Then the scientists uploaded about two hundred theses on the desired topic to the ChatGPT chat and asked to take them into account, and finally, they themselves began to actively participate in writing the text. To do this, they read the neural network's responses and suggested making corrections.
After using ChatGPT to generate the text, the authors formatted it into a scientific article and submitted it for review. Thirty-two experts studied the text from the bot and expressed their opinions.
Key findings of the study:
using ChatGPT to prepare texts for scientific journals is quite realistic, the texts are of a sufficient level;
the bot performs purely theoretical tasks well, when you need to take a large amount of data, compile it and draw conclusions from it;