Everything You Wanted to Know About Generative AI's Landmark Lawsuit

[sadiksojib35]

Lately, we have had to get used to the fact that The New York Times materials are biased, full of speculation, absurdity and made-up facts. Israeli AI strategist Mikael Gorsky shared his opinion in a Facebook* post. RB.ru publishes this text in full.

The author's spelling and punctuation have been dominican republic telegram database preserved.

Subscribe to RB.RU in Telegram
1
The “Great Complaint” (The New York Times v. Microsoft and OpenAI), filed on December 27, 2023, is the same: built on misrepresentations, dubious reasoning, and false assumptions. It makes seven allegations against the defendants:

Charge I: Copyright Infringement (17 U.S.C. § 501) - This charge alleges that defendants directly infringed the copyrights of The New York Times by using The New York Times content in training and operating large language models (LLMs), creating generative output that includes copies and derivative works of The New York Times works. The complaint alleges that this violates The New York Times's exclusive rights under copyright law.

Charge II: Indirect Copyright Infringement - The New York Times alleges that Microsoft controlled, directed, and benefited from the infringement committed by OpenAI. Microsoft is said to have provided the necessary infrastructure and profited by including GPT in its products.

Charge III: Contributing to Copyright Infringement (against Microsoft) - This charge focuses on Microsoft's role in the infringement. It alleges that Microsoft substantially aided and abetted the infringement by providing the computing infrastructure and resources necessary to operate GPT.

Charge IV: Contributing to Copyright Infringement (against all defendants) - This charge is an alternation to Charge III and alleges that all defendants have materially aided and abetted the direct infringement of The New York Times' copyrights by end users of GPT-based products.

Charge V: Digital Millennium Copyright Act – Removal of Copyright Management Information (17 U.S.C. § 1202) – The New York Times alleges that the defendants removed copyright information from New York Times materials in violation of the DMCA. This charge focuses on the defendants’ actions to remove or alter The New York Times copyright notices and other identifying information from their works.